Crash games have a simple format: players place a stake, watch a multiplier rise and try to cash out before the round ends. Navigator (developed by Solidicon) and Aviator (developed by Spribe) share the same basic idea. But their interfaces, betting options and displayed features are different, so players might prefer one over the other.
How the two games work
Both games start at a multiplier of 1.00x, which increases as the round progresses. Players decide when to cash out before the multiplier crashes. If a cash-out request is accepted in time, the payout is calculated using the accepted multiplier. If the round ends first, the stake is lost.
The crash point is random in both games. Previous results don’t predict the next round, and there isn’t a reliable method of predicting when a crash will occur in either game.
Bets and cash-out
One of the main differences between Navigator and Aviator is the number of bets available in a single round.
Navigator supports up to four active bet panels. Each panel represents a separate stake, and players can make individual cash-out decisions for their bets. For example, someone with two active bets could cash out one at a lower multiplier while leaving the other in play. The second stake remains at risk until its cash-out is accepted or the round ends. Players exploring crash games on an online casino Malawi can find Navigator among the options.
Aviator offers up to two bet panels per round.
Both games support manual cash-out controls, and automatic cash-out is available in both. With automatic cash-out, players can set a target multiplier where the feature is offered. The game attempts to cash out when that target is reached, but the round may end before the target is achieved.
Having more bet panels does not improve the odds of a round ending at a particular multiplier. The crash multiplier is determined by the game’s outcome mechanism, not by how many bet panels you use.
In other words, more panels let you place more bets or use different cash-out targets, but they don’t make a particular crash multiplier more likely.
Both games have a plane theme.
Navigator’s betting panels and cash-out controls are displayed on the game screen.
Aviator features a red plane and a two-panel betting layout. It also includes a live bets panel showing other players’ cash-outs as the round unfolds.
Both games provide in-game chat, so players can see and participate in conversations while playing. These social features do not influence the crash point.
RTP compared
Return to player (RTP) is another difference. Navigator’s RTP range is 96.52%-96.90%, with the operator setting the value within Solidicon’s range. Aviator’s published RTP is 97%.
RTP describes the theoretical average return across a very large number of rounds, not the result of one individual session. At a theoretical RTP of 97%, the house edge is 3%. A higher published RTP does not guarantee a better result in any particular round.
In other words, don’t assume you’ll get 97% of your money back after just 10 rounds when the RTP is 97. The RTP percentage reflects a theoretical average over a very large number of rounds, and your actual results can be very different.
Players should check each game’s rules panel for its current RTP, stake limits and cash-out conditions before playing.
Takeaway
Neither game is easier to win, and neither can be mastered – both involve random outcomes and carry a financial risk. Players should set a spending limit before starting, and use only money they can afford to lose.
